Selskabers partsevne – et krydsfelt mellem selskabsretten og procesretten

Nordisk Tidsskrift for Selskabsret

2024 - nummer 1

Udgivet: 26. marts 2024

Sider: 33 - 43 (11 sider)

In this article, the legal capacity to be a party to legal proceedings is discussed in the context of company law meeting procedural law. In Danish law, the “ordinary” capacity to be a party to legal proceedings for entities with a legal personality is developed in codified company law provisions and in company case law as far as establishing and ending this capacity is concerned. However, uncodified procedural law principles may in some circumstances intervene with company law and thereby disregard from both company law principles and certain procedural law principles, when setting aside the “ordinary” company law capacity to be a party to legal proceedings. In other cases, judges grant a capacity to be a party to legal proceedings to groups of individuals, who would not have such a capacity following common company law rules or principles. This would be a “special” and/or “requisite” (limited) capacity to be a party to legal proceedings. The article concludes, that the capacity to be a party to legal proceedings cannot be defined as absolute.

1. Indledning

Det partsevnebegreb, som anvendes i forbindelse med selskaber og visse andre samvirkeformer, er ikke et materielt absolut begreb.

Den »almindelige« partsevne beror i hovedsagen på selskabsretlig regulering og praksis, når det gælder indtræden, ophør og afgørelsen af, hvem der er beføjet til at forvalte selskabets partsevne (procesevnen). Imidlertid er denne almindelige partsevne ikke mere absolut, end at domstolene kan frakende, tilsidesætte, underkende eller undlade at a ...

Tryk Enter for at åbne menuen til dette indhold.
Cover af Nordisk Tidsskrift for Selskabsret

Vil du læse denne artikel?

Køb adgang til denne og andre artikler på Jurabibliotek.

Køb adgang

Har du allerede købt adgang? Log ind her